[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":246},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tool-start:bazi-marriage":3,"tool-calculator:bazi-marriage:en":185},{"slug":4,"locale":5,"title":6,"shortTitle":7,"description":8,"category":9,"badge":10,"status":11,"icon":12,"iconColor":13,"highlights":14,"sections":19,"faqs":148,"inputs":158,"freePreview":171,"paidUnlock":171,"priceOptions":181,"seo":182},"bazi-marriage","en","BaZi Relationship Comparison Worksheet","Relationship Comparison","Compare two anonymous birth profiles with the traditional rules explained on this page, then turn the result into questions about communication, expectations, boundaries, and uncertainty rather than predicting relationship outcomes.","BaZi","Featured","live","fas fa-heart","from-pink-500 to-rose-600",[15,16,17,18],"Two anonymous birth profiles","Clearly explained traditional-rule reference score","Five-elements record","Discussion and review prompts",[20,51,76,81,90,95,100,108,115,122,129,136,143],{"heading":21,"body":22,"table":25},"How the traditional-rule reference score is calculated",[23,24],"The reference score comes from the fixed traditional relations listed on this page. It is not trained on relationship outcomes, has not been tested against real relationship data, and must not be read as a probability of compatibility, marriage, separation, or safety.","The calculation begins at 70, applies only the Day Master and year-pillar relations below, and displays a result from 50 to 95. Names, gender, relationship stage, income, appearance, and private behavior do not change the score.",{"headers":26,"rows":30},[27,28,29],"Traditional relation","Score change","What is actually compared",[31,35,39,43,47],[32,33,34],"Same Day Master element","+8","The element assigned to each day stem is the same",[36,37,38],"Day Master elements generate one another","+15","Either element precedes the other in the traditional generating cycle",[40,41,42],"Day Master elements control one another","-12","Either element precedes the other in the traditional controlling cycle",[44,45,46],"Year stem combination or year branch Six Harmony","+6","The year-pillar pair appears in a fixed traditional lookup set",[48,49,50],"Year branch clash","-8","The year branches appear in the fixed Six Clashes lookup set",{"heading":52,"body":53,"table":56},"Four discussion-topic reference scores",[54,55],"These four values summarize only the traditional relations listed here. They do not measure communication, collaboration, money behavior, caregiving, fertility, or relationship quality. Every value remains within the stated range after the listed additions and deductions.","The labels organize discussion only. Real behavior, consent, safety, values, responsibilities, financial records, and conflict repair take priority over every reference score.",{"headers":57,"rows":61},[58,59,60],"Discussion topic","Starting value and rules","Display range",[62,66,70,73],[63,64,65],"Interaction","Start 60; +25 generating Day Masters; +15 same element; -10 controlling relation; +10 year harmony","40-100",[67,68,69],"Collaboration","Start 65; +15 without year clash; +12 year harmony; +8 generating or same Day Masters","45-100",[71,72,69],"Resources","Start 60; +20 when both element spreads are at most 2, otherwise +10 when either spread is at most 3; +10 generating Day Masters",[74,75,69],"Caregiving","Start 65; +15 month-branch harmony; +10 without a month-branch clash",{"heading":77,"body":78},"What the worksheet actually uses",[79,80],"The calculation uses the two visible Day Master elements, selected year-stem and year-branch lookup pairs, visible element-count spreads, and the two month branches. It does not calculate Ten Gods relationship roles, spouse palaces, attachment style, intent, consent, safety, fertility, or future timing.","When either birth time is unknown, the hour pillar is omitted. The page keeps that uncertainty visible, but even complete birth details cannot turn a traditional chart comparison into a measurement of relationship quality.",{"heading":82,"body":83,"bullets":84},"Turn each label into a question with real evidence","Use the four labels only to organize a conversation, then answer them without relying on the chart.",[85,86,87,88,89],"Interaction: choose one recent disagreement and record what each person said, heard, needed, and did next.","Collaboration: list one shared responsibility, its owner, deadline, and what happens when a commitment cannot be met.","Resources: compare an actual budget, debt, risk limit, and disclosure expectation; the reference score uses no financial data.","Caregiving: discuss whether either person wants a caregiving role, what capacity exists, and which family boundaries require consent.","Safety: any coercion, control, fear, or harm overrides the worksheet and requires appropriate real-world support.",{"heading":91,"body":92},"Run a 30-day relationship review",[93,94],"Select one discussion question and one observable agreement. Record the starting problem, both people's wording, the action, consent, review date, supporting evidence, and counterevidence. Do not ask one partner to accept a chart label as a fact about them.","After 30 days, mark the agreement keep, revise, or stop. A change in real communication does not prove the reference score accurate; it only shows whether the agreed action helped during that period.",{"heading":96,"body":97},"When this worksheet is not the right tool",[98,99],"Do not use a reference score to decide whether someone is trustworthy, whether to marry or separate, whether to have children, or whether unsafe behavior should be tolerated. Enter another person's birth details only with permission.","Relationship safety, legal rights, housing, immigration, money, mental health, and medical decisions require direct evidence and qualified support from the relevant domain. A second chart calculation cannot resolve those issues.",{"heading":101,"body":102,"bullets":105},"Reading a relationship comparison",[103,104],"The comparison uses two sets of birth information to organise traditional relationship categories. It does not measure affection, consent, communication skill, or the future of a relationship. Read each output as a prompt for questions about expectations, boundaries, conflict habits, and practical plans.","Before using the result, agree that both people can discuss it without pressure. Do not show a score as proof that a relationship must continue or end. A useful follow-up is to compare the symbolic discussion with an ordinary conversation about money, time, family roles, privacy, and conflict repair. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[106,107],"Check the specific issue described in “Reading a relationship comparison” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.","Keep the action reversible and record what evidence would change the decision.",{"heading":109,"body":110,"bullets":113},"A practical review step",[111,112],"After opening this tool, write down the inputs and the question before reading the result. For reading a relationship comparison, distinguish what the calculation displays from what the explanatory language adds. If a term is unfamiliar, look it up in the related guide rather than treating it as self-explanatory.","Then choose one low-risk, independently reasonable next step and define when you will review it. If the recommendation would still make sense without the symbolic interpretation, it is more likely to be proportionate. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[114,107],"Check the specific issue described in “A practical review step” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.",{"heading":116,"body":117,"bullets":120},"Limits and reader control",[118,119],"The page is designed to explain a traditional method, not to create urgency or dependence. Readers may disagree with an interpretation, seek another view, or stop after the calculation. No result should be used to pressure another person or to justify an irreversible choice.","Keep the original input and method visible when sharing a result. This makes the discussion easier to correct and prevents a short label from being presented as a complete account of a person or situation. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[121,107],"Check the specific issue described in “Limits and reader control” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.",{"heading":123,"body":124,"bullets":127},"Read the comparison as a conversation aid",[125,126],"This tool organises two sets of birth information through a traditional comparison framework. The output cannot measure care, consent, honesty, conflict skills, finances, or whether either person feels safe. Before using it, agree that both people may disagree with the interpretation and that no score or label will be used to pressure the other person.","A useful reading turns each category into a conversation question: How do we handle time apart? Which financial expectations are unstated? How do we repair an argument? What boundaries do we need with relatives? Those questions have value whether or not the traditional comparison feels persuasive. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[128,107],"Check the specific issue described in “Read the comparison as a conversation aid” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.",{"heading":130,"body":131,"bullets":134},"A responsible couple review",[132,133],"Write the result beside ordinary information about the relationship, not above it. Compare communication habits, shared plans, money arrangements, privacy, division of work, and how each person responds to stress. If the symbolic output conflicts with lived evidence, give the lived evidence priority.","Never use a relationship tool to diagnose abuse, justify surveillance, or make a decision on behalf of another adult. If there is coercion or danger, seek appropriate support. The safest use of the page is reflective, voluntary, and reversible. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[135,107],"Check the specific issue described in “A responsible couple review” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.",{"heading":137,"body":138,"bullets":141},"A final checklist before discussing the comparison",[139,140],"Use this tool page as a starting point for a specific question. Write down the information you already know, the information you still need, and the practical decision that must remain yours. Then identify one assumption that could be wrong and one ordinary explanation that should be checked. This small pause makes the reading more transparent and gives the material a useful place in an actual situation.","Before acting, compare cost, reversibility, safety, and consent. A symbolic interpretation should not pressure you to spend money, change a shared space without agreement, or ignore professional advice. Keep a short record of what you expected, what you did independently, and what you later observed. A reader can value traditional knowledge while remaining free to question, postpone, or reject an interpretation. For bazi marriage, verify the displayed inputs and method notes before sharing the result.",[142,107],"Check the specific issue described in “A final checklist before discussing the comparison” before changing the arrangement or interpretation.",{"heading":144,"body":145},"A final case note",[146,147],"A final lesson note about BaZi Relationship Comparison Worksheet should connect the named method with a concrete case. Preserve the input, source, date, convention, and uncertainty, then describe the ordinary situation before applying specialist vocabulary. Compare the traditional interpretation with one practical explanation and state which conclusion remains unproven.","Use one small reversible exercise and set a review date. Record cost, consent, affected people, and what actually changed, including inconvenient results. If the topic touches health, money, law, safety, work, or relationship boundaries, use the relevant professional or shared process. The method supports cultural learning and reflection; it does not guarantee an outcome.",[149,152,155],{"question":150,"answer":151},"What does the report focus on?","The report documents the two calculated profiles, compares a declared set of five-element and branch relationships, and turns the result into discussion prompts about communication, expectations, boundaries, and uncertainty.",{"question":153,"answer":154},"Can I use it without birth time?","Yes. Birth time improves detail, but you can leave it unknown and still generate a preview.",{"question":156,"answer":157},"How should two people review a low compatibility score?","Treat the score as a prompt, not a verdict. Verify the birth inputs, read the separate communication and lifestyle factors, and discuss one real example together. A relationship cannot be accepted or rejected by a chart score, and concerns about safety or coercion require qualified support rather than another calculation.",[159,167,175,178],{"name":160,"label":161,"type":162,"required":163,"purpose":164,"validation":165,"missingImpact":166},"personABirthDate","Person A birth date","date",true,"Establishes the calendar and timing data used by the calculation.","Use a valid calendar date that is not in the future.","The tool cannot produce a reliable result without this required value.",{"name":168,"label":169,"type":170,"required":171,"purpose":172,"validation":173,"missingImpact":174},"personABirthTime","Person A birth time","time",false,"Adds the time pillar or time-dependent detail when the method supports it.","Use a valid local time; leave it blank only when this item is optional.","The tool will continue with reduced detail and will not infer the missing value.",{"name":176,"label":177,"type":162,"required":163,"purpose":164,"validation":165,"missingImpact":166},"personBBirthDate","Person B birth date",{"name":179,"label":180,"type":170,"required":171,"purpose":172,"validation":173,"missingImpact":174},"personBBirthTime","Person B birth time",[],{"title":6,"description":183,"path":184},"Compare two anonymous birth profiles with clearly explained traditional-rule reference scores, then turn the result into questions for real communication, consent, boundaries, and reflection.","\u002Ftools\u002Fbazi-marriage",{"slug":4,"locale":5,"title":6,"shortTitle":7,"description":8,"category":9,"badge":10,"status":11,"icon":12,"iconColor":13,"highlights":186,"sections":187,"faqs":235,"inputs":239,"freePreview":171,"paidUnlock":171,"priceOptions":244,"seo":245},[15,16,17,18],[188,198,207,209,211,213,215,218,221,224,227,230,233],{"heading":21,"body":189,"table":190},[23,24],{"headers":191,"rows":192},[27,28,29],[193,194,195,196,197],[32,33,34],[36,37,38],[40,41,42],[44,45,46],[48,49,50],{"heading":52,"body":199,"table":200},[54,55],{"headers":201,"rows":202},[58,59,60],[203,204,205,206],[63,64,65],[67,68,69],[71,72,69],[74,75,69],{"heading":77,"body":208},[79,80],{"heading":82,"body":83,"bullets":210},[85,86,87,88,89],{"heading":91,"body":212},[93,94],{"heading":96,"body":214},[98,99],{"heading":101,"body":216,"bullets":217},[103,104],[106,107],{"heading":109,"body":219,"bullets":220},[111,112],[114,107],{"heading":116,"body":222,"bullets":223},[118,119],[121,107],{"heading":123,"body":225,"bullets":226},[125,126],[128,107],{"heading":130,"body":228,"bullets":229},[132,133],[135,107],{"heading":137,"body":231,"bullets":232},[139,140],[142,107],{"heading":144,"body":234},[146,147],[236,237,238],{"question":150,"answer":151},{"question":153,"answer":154},{"question":156,"answer":157},[240,241,242,243],{"name":160,"label":161,"type":162,"required":163,"purpose":164,"validation":165,"missingImpact":166},{"name":168,"label":169,"type":170,"required":171,"purpose":172,"validation":173,"missingImpact":174},{"name":176,"label":177,"type":162,"required":163,"purpose":164,"validation":165,"missingImpact":166},{"name":179,"label":180,"type":170,"required":171,"purpose":172,"validation":173,"missingImpact":174},[],{"title":6,"description":183,"path":184},1787369703174]